I was SOOO disappointed. I was hoping he'd jokingly point out the dozen or so different ways it was possible to have rigged the live bit on Weds, then launched into a nice clever bit of probability to prove how daft anyone is for entering the lottery. Instead he gave us automatic writing (which he's already debunked) and some maths which was so specious even I could tell it was cobblers in multiple different ways. (An averaging of 24 people's choice of a number between 1 and 49 that comes out with 2? Pffft.)
I'm glad at least he threw in the 'or maybe I rigged the machine' bit for lols, but it seemed like the opposite of his usual technique: he seemed to think we might believe in that 'wisdom of the crowd' bollocks, when usually he shows us why we shouldn't. My faith is all shaken, poo.
no subject
I'm glad at least he threw in the 'or maybe I rigged the machine' bit for lols, but it seemed like the opposite of his usual technique: he seemed to think we might believe in that 'wisdom of the crowd' bollocks, when usually he shows us why we shouldn't. My faith is all shaken, poo.